Abstract
ABSTRACT Borrowing Bill Nichols' distinction between documen-tary film and reality TV, this piece evaluates Fahrenheit 9/11 in terms of its ““reactive politics.”” Although successful, the film's political ef-fectiveness is compromised by Michael Moore's celebrity. Unable to sustain the tropes of social solidarity of his earlier films, he resorts to strategies that ultimately undermine his political objectives.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
