Abstract
In a recent survey, performed at the Division of Quality Technology & Statistics, Lulea University, Sweden, it has been studied how 100 Swedish organisations conduct process capability studies. As a result from the survey it was obvious that many theoretical aspects of how process capability studies should be conducted were not considered within the organisations where process capability studies actually were conducted. This fact led to a second survey, trying to explain this gap between theory and practice. This paper focuses on the result from this second survey. It has been found that the reason why the implementation of process capability studies sometimes fails is mainly due to management errors, but also due to some facts of reality, traditional personal attitudes and methodological issues. All identified reasons to failures in implementation of process capability studies are illustrated in an Ishikawa diagram. Most of the obstacles causing difficulties when implementing process capability studies can probably also be related to the implementation of other “hard” methods of TQM.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.