Abstract

AbstractWhat can a good’s durability tell us about its market organization? This paper argues that the socially expected durability of goods is one of their most important features. It illuminates temporal and material aspects of market organization and social change across different markets. While recent literature in the sociology of markets tends to emphasize financial goods, intangible assets, and the service economy, markets for material durable and nondurable consumer goods are still surprisingly pervasive in everyday life and in the household economy, as well as in modern economies’ basic infrastructure. Based on a comparison of the extreme cases of durable housing and fresh fish markets, we come to the general finding that the higher a good’s expected durability, the smaller the share of its new production will be and the larger its aftermarkets. Furthermore, it will be more tightly linked to credit and insurance markets, and its market will be more volatile in the short-term, but more inert in the long-term. Beyond this static distinction, we show how socio-technical mechanisms can “durabilize” or “dedurabilize” goods and hence change their market form. By comparing markets along the durability dimension, this paper contributes to a comparative sociology of market organization that goes beyond single-market studies, while at the same time opening up space for a more dynamic understanding of social change and market segmentation over time.

Highlights

  • INTHEHISTORY of capitalism, durable goods and the durabilization of ever more commodities have played a pivotal role, in bothAlexander Dobeson, Department of Sociology, Uppsala UniversityEuropean Journal of Sociology, 61, 1, (2020), pp. 33–64 0003-9756/20/0000-900$07.50per art + $0.10 per page ã European Journal of Sociology 2020

  • Our dynamic analysis reveals how mechanisms of durabilization and de-durabilization can bring about changes in the market structure of housing and fish market segments: freezing and the fresh-fish movement altered the durability of fish and changed its accompanying market structure, whereas, as we argue below, the introduction of mobile homes altered the lifeexpectancy of housing and its market form

  • In order to shed light on this question, we argue that a dynamic sociological reading of the original neoclassical distinction between durable and nondurable goods serves as a suitable starting point for our comparative analysis of market organization

Read more

Summary

Introduction

INTHEHISTORY of capitalism, durable goods and the durabilization of ever more commodities have played a pivotal role, in both. Within both markets there are vast differences that allow for further contrasts, such as between mobile homes and villas or between fresh luxury fish and canned anchovies, as the following will show. Despite their volatility in supply, fresh fish markets are relatively low risk.

Dynamics
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call