Abstract

Information about the quality of hospitals is becoming increasingly available for patients in the Netherlands. Consequently, patients are able to make an informed hospital choice. However, previous research reveals that patients do not or barely use quality information in their hospital choice. This is puzzling from the perspective of the demand-driven health care system, which considers patients as rational health consumers, capable of making independent choices. This article is meant to study why the Dutch patients do not use quality information. In order to answer this question, patients with nonacute ailments visiting the hospital clinics of several departments of a Dutch hospital were asked to fill in a self-administered questionnaire about their hospital choice and use of quality information. A total of 479 patients were included in the sample. The response rate was 81.9%. The results show that 5.2% of the respondents had actually seen quality information and 4.0% had used it in their hospital choice. Logistic regression analysis was carried out in order to explain why some patients use quality information and some do not. This analysis shows that nonusers compared to users are more frequently females, were older, have relatively more trust in their GP’s and distrust quality information more often.

Highlights

  • The development of relevant information about the quality of hospitals increases

  • As a result patients are increasingly able to utilize this information in their hospital choice [1,2,3,4,5] (Marshall et al, 2000; Lugtenberg & Westert, 2007; Dijs-Elsinga et al, 2010; Marangh-van de Mheen, 2011; Wolters & Lako, 2012)

  • We present the outcomes of a statistical analysis designed to answer the question what variables are related to the barely use of quality information

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The development of relevant information about the quality of hospitals increases. As a result patients are increasingly able to utilize this information in their hospital choice [1,2,3,4,5] (Marshall et al, 2000; Lugtenberg & Westert, 2007; Dijs-Elsinga et al, 2010; Marangh-van de Mheen, 2011; Wolters & Lako, 2012).In the Netherlands (2003-2006) the Health Insurance Act (Zorgverzekeringswet) is grounded on a demanddriven health care system model. The development of relevant information about the quality of hospitals increases. As a result patients are increasingly able to utilize this information in their hospital choice [1,2,3,4,5] (Marshall et al, 2000; Lugtenberg & Westert, 2007; Dijs-Elsinga et al, 2010; Marangh-van de Mheen, 2011; Wolters & Lako, 2012). The patient is considered as a rational consumer being able to make independent decisions. Offering freedom of choice is not sufficient. The public release of performance data in the form of quality and outcomes information about hospitals and providers is deemed necessary [6] (Lako & Rosenau, 2009)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call