Why do we need a biomechanical approach to the ocular rigidity concept?

Abstract

AbstractOcular rigidity in ophthalmology is generally assumed to be a measurable surrogate parameter related to the biomechanical properties of the whole globe. Clinical tonometry and tonography, as well as recently developed methods to assess the ocular pulse amplitude and pulsatile ocular blood flow and measurements with the ocular response analyzer are based on the concept of ocular rigidity. Clinical concepts of ocular rigidity describe a resulting effect without considerations of possible diverse morphology and material properties of the different ocular tissues. It is commonly accepted that ocular rigidity is related to the elasticity of the sclera. Many formulations are however dependent on the internal volume of the globe, intraocular pressure, corneal biomechanics and thickness of the corneoscleral shell. Sometimes this is extended to biomechanical properties of the ocular vasculature and perfusion pressure. Therefore ocular rigidity is expressed in various units and has different physical meanings but the same name is used which is confusing. Ocular biomechanics introduces parameters of elasticity and viscoelasticity of the sclera, cornea and other tissues which consider the morphology of the different tissues describing their mechanical properties such as: Young’s modules of the sclera and Poisson’s ratios of the cornea. When applying these rigorous statements and methods of biomechanical modeling a unified concept for ocular rigidity can be developed in order to link the limited clinical concepts, to improve them and to better understand the results of clinical measurements.