Abstract

Areas of co-occurrence between two species (sympatry) are often thought to arise in regions where abiotic conditions are conducive to both species and are therefore intermediate between regions where either species occurs alone (allopatry). Depending on historical factors or interactions between species, however, sympatry might not differ from allopatry, or, alternatively, sympatry might actually be more extreme in abiotic conditions relative to allopatry. Here, we evaluate these three hypothesized patterns for how sympatry compares to allopatry in abiotic conditions. We use two species of congeneric spadefoot toads, Spea multiplicata and S. bombifrons, as our study system. To test these hypotheses, we created ecological niche models (specifically using Maxent) for both species to create a map of the joint probability of occurrence of both species. Using the results of these models, we identified three types of locations: two where either species was predicted to occur alone (i.e., allopatry for S. multiplicata and allopatry for S. bombifrons) and one where both species were predicted to co-occur (i.e., sympatry). We then compared the abiotic environment between these three location types and found that sympatry was significantly hotter and drier than the allopatric regions. Thus, sympatry was not intermediate between the alternative allopatric sites. Instead, sympatry occurred at one extreme of the conditions occupied by both species. We hypothesize that biotic interactions in these extreme environments facilitate co-occurrence. Specifically, hybridization between S. bombifrons females and S. multiplicata males may facilitate co-occurrence by decreasing development time of tadpoles. Additionally, the presence of alternative food resources in more extreme conditions may preclude competitive exclusion of one species by the other. This work has implications for predicting how interacting species will respond to climate change, because species interactions may facilitate survival in extreme habitats.

Highlights

  • What determines whether or not closely related species cooccur? the forces that govern species distributions have long been a focus of ecological study [1,2,3,4,5], ascertaining what factors set the boundaries between closely related species is of special interest for understanding the evolutionary and ecological implications of species interactions [6,7,8]

  • In generating the alternative niche models, we found that, each model used a different subset of environmental variables, all four models showed similar areas of predicted occurrence (Figure S1, Figure S2, Figure S3)

  • When we contrasted these principal components between sympatry, allopatry for S. bombifrons, and allopatry for S. multiplicata using an ANOVA, we found a significant effect of region on both PC scores (PC 1: F(2, 287) = 35.522, p,0.001; PC 2: F(2, 287) = 21.678, p,0.001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The forces that govern species distributions have long been a focus of ecological study [1,2,3,4,5], ascertaining what factors set the boundaries between closely related species is of special interest for understanding the evolutionary and ecological implications of species interactions [6,7,8]. One way to evaluate why closely related species occur sympatrically in some regions but not others is to compare the abiotic conditions in sympatry versus allopatry. Because different types of interactions between the two species and their environment dictate each pattern, ascertaining how sympatry and allopatry differ lends insight into the types of factors driving co-occurrence of closely related species

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.