Abstract

Using a sample of 22,839 US firm-year observations over the period 1991-2012, we find that high CSR firms pay more dividends than low CSR firms. This is consistent with our expectation that socially responsible firms may use dividend policy to manage the agency problems related to overinvestment in CSR. The analysis of individual components of CSR provides strong support for this main finding: five of the six dimensions used in the analysis are also associated with high dividend payout, namely, corporate governance, community, diversity, employee relations, and the environment. Furthermore, by analyzing the stability of dividend payout, we find that socially irresponsible firms adjust dividends quicker than socially responsible firms: dividend payout is more stable in high CSR firms than in low CSR firms. Additional results show that firms involved in two controversial activities – the military and alcohol – are associated with low dividend payouts, which is likely to be due to the high cost of external funding for these firms as highlighted by Goss and Roberts (2011). Our findings are robust to alternative assumptions and model specifications, alternative measures of dividend payout, additional control variables, and several approaches to address endogeneity and selection bias issues.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call