Why Disability Studies Needs to Take Religion Seriously

Sarah Imhoff

doi:10.3390/rel8090186

Abstract

Religion and theology are central ways that many people make sense of the world and their own place in that world. But the insights of critical studies of religion, or what is sometimes positioned as religious studies as opposed to theology, are scarce in disability literature. This article suggests some of the costs of this oversight and some of the benefits of including religion. First, this article discusses how some past scholarly engagements of disability and religion have misrepresented and denigrated Judaism. Second, it argues that Judaism paints different disabilities in quite different ways, and that we cannot coherently talk about “disability in Judaism” as if it is a single thing. Third, it discusses the medical model and the social model, and shows how one Jewish woman’s writing on pain complicates how we might think about these models. In this way, the article shows how religious studies can both help remedy past mistakes and bring new insights to disability studies.

Highlights

Religion and theology are central ways that many people make sense of the world and their own place in that world
This article discusses how some past scholarly engagements of disability and religion have misrepresented and denigrated Judaism. It argues that Judaism paints different disabilities in quite different ways, and that we cannot coherently talk about “disability in Judaism” as if it is a single thing
It discusses the medical model and the social model, and shows how one Jewish woman’s writing on pain complicates how we might think about these models

Summary

Introduction

Religion and theology are central ways that many people make sense of the world and their own place in that world. There is no one unified category of people with disabilities; some physical and mental differences, such as inability to walk or being hard of seeing, have no marginal status in halakhah or Jewish tradition.

Results

Conclusion