Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present the dialogical approach to logic as an interesting alternative to the model-theoretic approach. In the introduction I plead for pluralism concerning logical systems and logical methodology before giving a short outline of Dialogical Logic. Then, I discuss and reject several prejudices against Dialogical Logic. I present three conceptual distinctions that are characteristic of the dialogical approach to logic (namely, formal vs. general truth, level of games vs. level of strategies and particle rules vs. structural rules) and their fruitfulness for logical research is demonstrated at the hand of some examples.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
