Abstract
In this paper, we examine why some bidders decide not to hire investment bank advisors in M&A transactions. We build a sample of 181 M&A transactions in which the acquiring firms do not hire investment bank advisors, and compare them with a control sample of 181 M&A transactions in which the acquiring firms hire investment bank advisors. We find that the transaction costs are the primary reason that investment banks are hired as advisors for bidders in M&A transactions. In addition, the information asymmetry and contracting costs are the other two reasons that bidders hire investment banks in M&A transactions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
