Abstract
For centuries, scholars have puzzled over why so many lawyers are elected to Congress. This paper draws on a wealth of new data to weigh in on why this age-old representation imbalance has endured. While lawyers enter politics at much higher rates, self-selection at best offers a partial explanation. Conditional on running, lawyers win at twice the rate of candidates from other backgrounds. Contrary to prevailing theories in the literature, voters do not reward candidates with backgrounds in law. Rather, lawyers win because of a sizable competitive advantage in early fundraising, owing in large part to their professional networks. This study has important implications about who runs for office, who wins, and the consequences for the demographic composition of Congress. It also identifies an underexplored mechanism by which the U.S. system of campaign finance sustains deep representational imbalances.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
