Abstract
It is a long-standing observation that most mutations are recessive. That is, they do not lead to visible phenotypic effects when in heterozygous combination with the wild-type allele. The reason for this has long been debated. Fisher (1930) attributed the observed dominance of the wild type to the action of natural selection at modifier loci. Wright (1929) on the other hand asserted that dominance did not have a selective functionper se, but was a more-or-less automatic offshoot of genetic regulatory mechanisms. The present essay discusses these explanations from a contemporary standpoint and suggests that neither is likely to be valid exclusively. In particular, even when physiology appears to offer a sufficient explanation, evolution of dominance cannot be ruled out.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
