Why and how to implement an electronic resident's surgical logbook to improve operating-room training? First 5-year feedback from a French center.

Abstract

The evaluation of general surgery residents' operating room (OR)-training and technical skills progression may be difficult in the absence of a standardized evaluation tool. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the implementation of an electronic "surgical logbook" for general surgery residents. A prospective single center study was conducted between May 2015 and October 2020. An electronic logbook was filled by all residents immediately after each surgical procedure and data were prospectively collected and analyzed. Fifty-five students (34 men/21 women) reported their participation to 6917 surgical procedures, which corresponded to 55.5% of all procedures performed in our department. Residents performed the entire procedure as the operating surgeon in 28.5% of cases (n=1963), parts of the procedure as operating surgeon in 32.5% of cases (n=2230) and as operating-assistant in 38.5% (n=2672). Residents were more likely an operating surgeon for the entire procedure when they were assisted by a fellow or a practicing physician than an associate professor or a clinical professor (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the major morbidity rate between different resident's contribution to the procedure (P=0.14). We present here a simple, useful and cost efficient tool which offers easy data collection and reporting that could help improve OR-training, OR-supervision and certification at a local or national level.