Abstract
AbstractMutual trust that is the bedrock of intra‐EU cooperation should not be equated to ‘blind trust’ when a Member State is under the ‘surveillance’ procedure foreseen by Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union. In this perspective it would be risky for the European Council to recognise a key coordinating role, as is the case when holding the Council Presidency, to a Member State under Article 7.1 TUE. It would then be sensible for the Council to modify its 2016 Decision, and delay the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union to such a time when the Article 7(1) TEU surveillance procedure will have been successfully concluded.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
