Abstract

This study applies a model of school organisation developed by one of the authors to investigate school improvement processes leading to a whole school approach in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) literature. The model is operationalized to a survey instrument and distributed to Swedish upper secondary teachers. The instrument provides empirical indications of teachers’ perceptions of their schools in terms of four major dimensions of an ESD whole school approach, the importance assigned to a holistic vision, routines and structures, professional knowledge creation, and practical pedagogical work. The aims of the study are to compare the teachers’ perception of their school organisation. We compare perceptions of teachers working in schools actively implementing ESD and teachers in comparable reference schools. Comparisons are also made between teachers from schools applying different strategies and quality approaches in implementing ESD. The results indicate that, relative to teachers in ordinary schools, those in ESD schools perceive their school organisations to have higher quality and coherence, with greater potential to support teaching and pedagogical work in practice. However, there is substantial variation in perceptions of teachers from different ESD schools. The model’s robustness is validated by coherence of earlier results in the same schools.

Highlights

  • The global sustainability agenda challenges traditional pedagogies and calls for a school education that fosters awareness of the complexities and uncertainty of the surrounding world

  • Using the Scherp model as an analytical tool, the following specific research questions regarding teachers’ perceptions of their school organisations are addressed: (1) Does the school organisation differ between Education for Sustainable Development (ESD)-active schools and reference schools? (2) Does the school organisation differ between ESD-active schools using award certification and interdisciplinary networking ESD implementation strategies? (3) Does the school organisation differ between schools using different general quality approaches? (4) How does the school organisation differ between schools in which ESD implementation strategies and general quality approaches are combined in different permutations?

  • Regarding the first research question (Does the school organisation differ between ESD-active schools and reference schools?), our results indicate that ESD-active schools, as a designated group generally have higher quality school improvement processes and more coherent organisations with greater potential to support practical teaching and pedagogical work than ordinary schools

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The global sustainability agenda challenges traditional pedagogies and calls for a school education that fosters awareness of the complexities and uncertainty of the surrounding world. The school culture should be conducive to conversation and based on ideals of student-centred approaches (Kelley and Dikkers 2016) By this definition, school improvement refers to collectively supporting factors in the organization that enhance students’possibilities for learning in relation to a complex surrounding world. The identified qualities are related to four key aspects: collaborative interaction and school improvement, student-centred education, cooperation with the local society, and proactive leadership (Mogren and Gericke 2017a). Each of these aspects represents a possible way of relating the school organisation to ESD. Engagement at all levels and distributed leadership are aspects highlighted by Leo and Wickenberg

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call