Abstract

Current best practices in peacebuilding emphasize the importance of integrated or comprehensive approaches that optimize donor state resources through improved coordination and coherence among the security, diplomacy, and development sectors. While these “whole-of-government” approaches have improved donor state engagements in fragile and conflict-affected states in recent years, donor governments have generally failed to effectively engage segments within their home societies that may not be active in peacebuilding activities but that have potential to influence peacebuilding outcomes abroad. A “whole-of-society” approach allows governments to identify and draw from non-traditional actors.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.