Abstract
Hybridization and admixture can threaten the genetic integrity of populations and be of particular concern to endangered species. Hybridization between grey wolves and dogs has been documented in many wolf populations worldwide and is a prominent example of human‐mediated hybridization between a domesticated species and its wild relative. We analysed whole‐genome sequences from >200 wolves and >100 dogs to study admixture in Fennoscandian wolf populations. A principal component analysis of genetic variation and admixture showed that wolves and dogs were well‐separated, without evidence for introgression. Analyses of local ancestry revealed that wolves had <1% mixed ancestry, levels comparable to the degree of mixed ancestry in many dogs, and likely not resulting from recent wolf–dog hybridization. We also show that the founders of the Scandinavian wolf population were genetically inseparable from Finnish and Russian Karelian wolves, pointing at the geographical origin of contemporary Scandinavian wolves. Moreover, we found Scandinavian‐born animals among wolves sampled in Finland, demonstrating bidirectional gene flow between the Scandinavian Peninsula and eastern countries. The low incidence of admixture between wolves and dogs in Fennoscandia may be explained by the fact that feral dogs are rare in this part of Europe and that careful monitoring and management act to remove hybrids before they backcross into wolf populations.
Highlights
Hybridization between species or populations frequently occur in nature (Arnold, 1997; Harrison, 1993; Mallet, 2005) and may lead to introgression of genetic material between taxa
The grey wolf is often seen as a flagship species for conservation and the handling of conflicts between humans and endangered species
4.1 | No evidence for wolf–dog hybridization threatening the genetic integrity of Fennoscandian wolf populations that technical issues underlie signatures of mixed ancestry, which we elaborate on below
Summary
Hybridization between species or populations frequently occur in nature (Arnold, 1997; Harrison, 1993; Mallet, 2005) and may lead to introgression of genetic material between taxa. In the early 1980s, a new population was founded in southern Sweden by two single individuals (Wabakken et al, 2001) The fact that they appeared 1,000 km from the nearest wolf population in Finland and Russia rose suspicion that it was not a natural settlement. We present a large-scale admixture analysis based on whole-genome sequences from >200 wolves from Scandinavia, Finland and Russia (Karelia), sampled over many years. We compare these data to a large number of dogs from multiple breeds and to wolves from other parts of the world.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.