Abstract

approximately 90% of the total variation are used as features. Hippocampal volume corrected for total intracranial volume is added as independent feature. The shape components are evaluated in the AD classification using bagged SVM with 25 resamplings. Results: Using hippocampal volume gave on average 83.47% accuracy (average of 20 repetitions). sing the features produced by SSMs alone provided the best performance (87.36%) when computed on the landmarks selected at p<0.05 (see Table). When combining hippocampus volume with the shape features, the best classification performance (88.07%) is achieved using the subregion identified by p<0.1. The Hotelling’s T2 significance map on the hippocampus shows that the regions of highest discrimination match with the CA1 and subiculum subfields (see Figure). Conclusions: Using hippocampal shape descriptors provides extra discrimination between AD and NC in addition to using volume alone. The shape components on the regions exhibiting more significant effect of the atrophy indicate a better representation of the hippocampal shape change associated with AD.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.