"Who We Are": Lawrence Levine as William Jamesian Pragmatist and as Gustave de Beaumont

Abstract

First of all, I wish to thank Roy Rosenzweig, Lawrence Glickman, James W. Cook, Olivia Ryan, and Mike O'Malley, organizers of this conference to honor a historian of enormous import, a brilliant scholar of intellectual generosity and personal warmth. Although I was neither student nor colleague of Larry Levine's, as a historian I grew up under the sign of his early work. As a member of the professoriate, I have shared his views on the need to open the American mind and his commitment to diversity in American student bodies and faculties. For some thirty years I have loved his writing, laughed at his jokes, appreciated his wife, and, in China in the mid-1980s, accompanied him on his travels. His illness saddens me deeply, even as I hope for his recovery. I know that as serious as is his cancer, healing remains possible. I take great pleasure in the opportunity to think aloud about one part of Larry Levine's provocative oeuvre. At least since the 1980s and surely since long before then, Levine has focused on, in his words, “who we are”: what it means to be an American, as manifested in conceptions of the shape and meaning of the past.1 I want to relate his long-term preoccupation with American identity to the work of four of his predecessors: two aristocratic French friends and fellow travelers, Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859) and Gustave de Beaumont (1802–1866), the American philosopher William James (1842–1910), and, of course, the contemporary who inspired Levine, Allan Bloom (1930–1992). Like Levine and Bloom, born about a century after the French aristocrats' visit to the United States, Tocqueville and Beaumont explored the nature of American identity. They wrestled with many of Levine's and Bloom's issues, matters now falling under the rubric of multiculturalism. Just as Levine saw himself as James's intellectual descendant, so Bloom harked back to Tocqueville.