Abstract

We study mechanisms to manage group purchasing among a set of buyers of a given product with a concave purchase cost function. The buyers are cost‐sensitive and willing to buy a range of product quantities at different prices. We investigate two types of mechanisms that can be used by a group purchasing organization (GPO): (a) ordering mechanisms where the buyers, without divulging private information, choose their order quantities and pay for them according to a given cost‐sharing rule or a fixed price; and (b) bidding mechanisms where the buyers announce their valuations for different quantities and the GPO determines their purchase quantities and cost‐shares according to pre‐announced schemes. Under the choice of appropriate cost‐sharing rules, we introduce a sequential joint ordering mechanism and a family of ordering strategies under which some buyers’ strategic deviations never worsen other buyers. We propose a class of bidding mechanisms with some desirable properties and show that a Nash equilibrium bid schedule always exists wherein all buyers’ profits are at least as high as those under truthful bidding. In our proposed mechanisms, some buyers’ strategic deviation from truthful bidding can only make the others better off. Thus, buyers need not worry about strategic behavior of their counterparts. We compare the performances of the system under different mechanisms and show the superiority of our proposed bidding mechanism. We show that the profits generated by our proposed bidding mechanisms under the proportional cost‐sharing rule are never dominated by the maximum profits of the first‐best fixed price.

Highlights

  • Group purchasing is becoming increasingly popular in both business-to-consumer (B2C) and business-tobusiness (B2B) environments due to advances in information technology and the development of online markets

  • As the main focus of this paper, we explore a costsharing approach that a group purchasing organization (GPO) can use to coordinate group purchasing

  • We prove that even if the GPO knows all buyers’ exact valuations, the profits generated by the first-best price cannot exceed the profits obtained through the largest Nash equilibrium for the joint ordering mechanism with the proportional cost-sharing rule

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Group purchasing is becoming increasingly popular in both business-to-consumer (B2C) and business-tobusiness (B2B) environments due to advances in information technology and the development of online markets. We first study joint ordering mechanisms wherein the buyers themselves determine order quantities, given the cost-sharing rule implemented by the GPO. We further evaluate the performance of our cost-sharing mechanisms by comparing them to results from a fixed price approach In such an approach, the GPO announces a unit price, while each buyer chooses his preferred order quantity and pays the total price of his order. We prove that even if the GPO knows all buyers’ exact valuations, the profits generated by the first-best price cannot exceed the profits obtained through the largest Nash equilibrium for the joint ordering mechanism with the proportional cost-sharing rule.

Literature Review
System Optimal Quantities
Ordering Mechanisms under Symmetric Information
Asymmetric Information
Lower-Bound Implementation
Numerical Examples
Findings
Final Remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call