Abstract

During 2020, communities all over the world suffered from infections and disruptions because of the Covid-19 pandemic. Health assistance in different forms was provided to assist patients. In addition, the South African Department of Health employed several measures to curb the spread of the virus. The traditional healers acting as basic health providers objected to not being asked to participate in government activities dealing with the virus. Data acquired through a qualitative approach provided insight into the pleas of traditional healers to support in the fight against Covid-19. Traditional healers were not consulted by the Department of Health, although the traditional healers are officially considered as part of the government system to provide healthcare. The Traditional Health Practitioners Act , no. 22 of 2007, provided legal recognition to traditional healers. There has been extensive written work dealing with the role of Traditional Healers in the South African healthcare system. This article investigated, through a consideration of the available literature, the differences between the Healing and Biomedical paradigms as two separate ways of presenting healthcare during the Covid-19 pandemic. Through a comparative study of the two approaches as represented by the paradigms, the reasons for not consulting and allowing traditional healers to participate in the fight against Covid-19 were investigated. Some of the reasons include the bias of science versus indigenous knowledge, as a basis for knowledge on health matters. The study recommended that traditional healers have a role to play and a contribution to make to the South African healthcare system and should be allowed to perform their activities. Contributions: The article contributes to the understanding of how different worldviews influence the application of medical services with a particular focus on treatment provided during the Covid-19 pandemic. The contribution to treatment by traditional healers is investigated. The relation between biomedical and traditional healing is highlighted with suggestions as to future collaboration.

Highlights

  • During 2020, the world suffered from the effects of the Covid-19 virus

  • It should be kept in mind that 80% – 90% of black patients in South Africa consult traditional healers as well as biomedical health practitioners (Pinkoane, Greeff & Koen 2012:13)

  • This research aims to investigate the reasons why traditional healers are not incorporated in the fight against Covid-19 in South Africa. This is not an investigation as to the validity and efficiency of treatment provided by traditional healers, but an investigation as to why traditional healers, even though officially recognised as part of the healthcare system, are not permitted to participate officially in the treatment and prevention of Covid-19 in South Africa

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During 2020, the world suffered from the effects of the Covid-19 virus. Different measures were employed to curb the spread of the virus. It should be kept in mind that 80% – 90% of black patients in South Africa consult traditional healers as well as biomedical health practitioners (Pinkoane, Greeff & Koen 2012:13). According to De Andrade (2012:120), 70% – 80% of people http://www.hts.org.za living in South Africa consult traditional healers before consulting other healthcare practitioners (compare Setswe 1999:57).

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call