Abstract
Semi‐natural habitats (SNHs) are becoming increasingly scarce in modern agricultural landscapes. This may reduce natural ecosystem services such as pest control with its putatively positive effect on crop production. In agreement with other studies, we recently reported wheat yield reductions at field borders which were linked to the type of SNH and the distance to the border. In this experimental landscape‐wide study, we asked whether these yield losses have a biotic origin while analyzing fungal seed and fungal leaf pathogens, herbivory of cereal leaf beetles, and weed cover as hypothesized mediators between SNHs and yield. We established experimental winter wheat plots of a single variety within conventionally managed wheat fields at fixed distances either to a hedgerow or to an in‐field kettle hole. For each plot, we recorded the fungal infection rate on seeds, fungal infection and herbivory rates on leaves, and weed cover. Using several generalized linear mixed‐effects models as well as a structural equation model, we tested the effects of SNHs at a field scale (SNH type and distance to SNH) and at a landscape scale (percentage and diversity of SNHs within a 1000‐m radius). In the dry year of 2016, we detected one putative biotic culprit: Weed cover was negatively associated with yield values at a 1‐m and 5‐m distance from the field border with a SNH. None of the fungal and insect pests, however, significantly affected yield, neither solely nor depending on type of or distance to a SNH. However, the pest groups themselves responded differently to SNH at the field scale and at the landscape scale. Our findings highlight that crop losses at field borders may be caused by biotic culprits; however, their negative impact seems weak and is putatively reduced by conventional farming practices.
Highlights
Intensification of agriculture has led to a depletion of semi-natural habitats (SNHs) in agricultural landscapes and to associated losses of biodiversity (Foley, 2005; Sala et al, 2000; Tilman et al, 2002)
To investigate whether the response of pest rates to SNH type and the distance to SNH is altered by increasing landscape complexity, we extended our scope to the landscape scale by accounting for the percentage and diversity of SNHs within a radius of 1,000 m
Arable weeds tended to be the only putative culprit of the biotic factors that might have been responsible for yield reduction in proximity to semi-natural habitats (SNHs) within conventionally managed wheat fields
Summary
Intensification of agriculture has led to a depletion of semi-natural habitats (SNHs) in agricultural landscapes and to associated losses of biodiversity (Foley, 2005; Sala et al, 2000; Tilman et al, 2002). SNHs have been shown to provide important biodiversity- mediated ecosystem services (Tscharntke et al, 2005) such as pollination (Bianchi et al, 2006; Garibaldi et al, 2011) and pest control (Chaplin-Kramer et al, 2011; Veres et al, 2013). Several studies observed a decrease in pest densities with increasing landscape complexity (Chaplin-Kramer & Kremen, 2012) either due to an effective pest control mediated through SNHs (Rusch et al, 2016) or due to a reduced amount of cropped habitat (Dominik et al, 2018). Understanding the role of SNHs on pest population dynamics and corresponding crop damage is a prerequisite for developing ecologically sustainable crop protection strategies in order to reduce intensive use of agrochemical inputs (Skellern et al, 2017)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.