Abstract

Japan has seen an increase in the incidents of financial frauds over the last couple of decades. Although authorities are aware of the problem, an effective solution eludes them as fraudsters use innovative swindling methods and continually change the target group. Using a nationwide survey conducted by Hiroshima University, Japan, in 2020, this study investigated the socioeconomic and psychological profiles of victims of trending and special financial fraud such as fictitious billing fraud, loan guarantee fraud, and refund fraud. It was found that financial fraud victims' profiles are dissimilar at the aggregate and specific levels. At the specific level, victim profiles were diverse, that is, in fictitious billing fraud, loan guarantee fraud, and refund fraud cases. Males, married, and financially less satisfied people were more often victims of fictitious billing fraud; less anxious people were more likely victims of loan guarantee fraud; and older, asset-holding, and less-income-generating respondents were found to be victims of refund fraud. Our results also show some commonalities in the victims' profiles. For example, financially less-literate people were found to be more likely victims of fictitious billing fraud and loan guarantee fraud. Finally, respondents who lived with their family, those who did not have careful buying habits, and those who suffer from bouts of loneliness were found to be common victims of all types of special financial fraud. The results of our study suggest that a one-size-fits-all policy cannot effectively combat financial fraud.

Highlights

  • BackgroundGlobally, incidents of “special” financial frauds, such as fictitious billing fraud, loan guarantee fraud, and refund fraud, have been on the rise over the last couple of decades causing concern among financial and legal authorities for the victims of these kinds of fraud (National Police Agency of Japan, 2009, 2017; Federal Trade Commission, 2013)

  • Special financial frauds Fictitious billing fraud Loan guarantee fraud Refund fraud Gender Age Marital status Living with family Education Financial literacy Employment status Household income Household assets Myopic view Financial satisfaction Anxiety Careful spending habit Trust Loneliness

  • Since we investigated how respondents’ demographic, socioeconomic, and psychological backgrounds are associated with special financial fraud at the aggregate and specific levels, it was important to isolate victims of a specific special financial fraud from those of other types of fraud

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Incidents of “special” financial frauds, such as fictitious billing fraud, loan guarantee fraud, and refund fraud, have been on the rise over the last couple of decades causing concern among financial and legal authorities for the victims of these kinds of fraud (National Police Agency of Japan, 2009, 2017; Federal Trade Commission, 2013). Authorities have been unable to find an effective solution to this problem, because fraudsters use innovative swindling methods and continually keep changing their target groups. There are limited studies on trending and special financial frauds such as fictitious billing fraud, loan guarantee fraud, and refund fraud. This gap needs to be addressed by a comprehensive study because fraudsters target victims with certain backgrounds using innovative swindling packages

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call