Abstract

<p>This paper investigates the role of managerial entrenchment in the decision to hire an investor relations specialist. Managers of small and mid-cap firms spend considerable resources on hiring investor relations (IR) firms. This paper proposes a hypothesis to explain this spending. We argue that more entrenched managers are less likely to hire IR firms, because such managers are less likely to have their compensation tied to stock returns and be more wary of outside attention from the market. Using a common definition of managerial entrenchment, we show that entrenched managers are indeed less likely to hire an IR firm. We also examine the relationship between the method of payment of the IR firm (cash or stock) and future performance of the client. If an IR firm is paid in stock, it has an incentive to expend more effort on its client’s behalf, thus leading to increased client performance. Our evidence shows that there is indeed a positive relationship between payment in stock and future client performance.</p>

Highlights

  • Managers of small and mid-cap firms spend significant resources on investor relations (IR) (Note 1) activities (Hong & Huang, 2005) (Note 2)

  • This paper examines two hypotheses concerning investor relations (IR) firms

  • This is the first paper that looks at the difference in performance of the firms that pay cash to investor relations firms compared with firms that pay noncash securities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Managers of small and mid-cap firms spend significant resources on investor relations (IR) (Note 1) activities (Hong & Huang, 2005) (Note 2). Bushee and Miller (2012) argue that managers could be motivated by attempting to increase visibility, stock liquidity, and stock price and to reduce the volatility of returns They argue that IR firms may be hired to provide information to the market about important events (e.g., hiring new management, acquisition or private placement). In a related theory paper, Healy and Palepu (2001) describe different motivations for a firm to voluntarily disclose more information about the firm (which is related to, but could be different from, the decision to hire an IR firm) Their list includes motives related to increasing stock returns (e.g., corporate control contests, stock compensation, and management talent signaling), as well as providing information about important events (e.g., capital market transactions and litigation). Hiring an investor relations firms might be a signal of good-quality managers

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call