Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article presents an ethnographic inquiry into the problems of theorizing about teaching and learning within a social context organized to suppress the subjective experiences and meanings of classroom actors. Three questions are explored: 1) What is the nature of curriculum practice in secondary education, and how does it shape the voices of students and teachers?; 2) What meanings do classroom actors construct about teaching and learning, and how do these meanings affect voice?; 3) How can a critical reading of curriculum practice enable preservice teachers and their students to make their own voices? Stories from one preservice English teacher's classroom experience illustrate the “struggle for voice” and the concurrent power struggles arising when curriculum practice mirrors school organization and its institutional values. I argue that conventional notions of curriculum can neither account for the classroom actors' struggles for their voices nor enable preservice teachers to explore social...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call