Abstract
Advance medical directives are designed to allow a patient to choose a designated agent to make his or her medical decisions should the patient lose decisionmaking capacity. Problems can arise, however, in determining when and if the patient has lost the capacity to make such decisions. We examine a case in which a man with end-stage acquired immunodeficiency syndrome was admitted to the hospital because his agent and family could no longer provide adequate health care at home. While the patient was hospitalized, a conflict about aggressive vs comfort care arose between his physicians and his agent and family, both sides claiming that they knew best what his health care wishes were. At present, there are no clear guidelines as to who evaluates decision-making capacity; therefore, this judgment often falls to psychiatrists or ethics committees or even to the courts. We offer a systematic approach to resolving these conflicts. The
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.