Who Benefits From a Cognitive vs. Behavioral Approach to Treating Depression? A Pilot Study of Prescriptive Predictors

Abstract

Although experts have suggested ways that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) of depression might be personalized for individual clients, there has been little empirical examination of this issue. We examine cognitive behavioral skills and vulnerabilities (i.e., dysfunctional thinking, behavioral inactivation, and avoidance) as potential prescriptive predictors to cognitive vs. behavioral interventions. Forty-two adults with major depressive disorder were randomized to eight weeks of cognitive-only (n = 21) or behavioral-only (n = 21) individual psychotherapy. Clients completed pre-treatment measures of cognitive and behavioral skills and vulnerabilities. Dropout rates were comparable across treatments (21% overall). Treatment outcomes did not differ significantly between treatments (g = .13). Cognitive skills were associated with superior outcomes in the behavioral-only treatment, but additional analyses suggested general skillfulness (i.e., the tendency to have high scores across cognitive and behavioral assessments), rather than cognitive skills per se, predicted a larger response to behavioral interventions. Similarly, behavioral avoidance of social and non-social domains were associated with worse outcomes in the behavioral-only treatment, indicating that behavioral approaches yield less positive outcomes for clients high in behavioral avoidance. If replicated, the results of this pilot study suggest ways that a cognitive behavioral therapist could select intervention strategies to suit individual clients and thereby improve treatment outcomes.