Abstract
Identity formation may be more complex for those who have been in foster care in the face of childhood abuse, difficult relationships, unstable environments, and multiple care contexts but this does not imply there is anything pathological about it. Given the higher levels of mental health difficulties in looked after children and the known role identity has in mental health, whether as a risk or a protective factor, it seems clinically significant to investigate what factors help construct or hinder the formation of identity for those who have been in care. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was used to analyze semistructured interviews of eight female care leavers about the understanding of their identity development. Three superordinate themes emerged which encapsulated participants’ identity development. These included Construction of Identity—How I Became Me, Understanding of Identity—Who am I, and Experience of Identity—How My Identity Plays Out. Participants’ construction of identity can be understood in the context of early adverse environments and developmental trauma. This construction of self, in turn, mediates how participants understand and experience their identity. Findings were discussed in relation to previous research, and limitations were outlined. Implications for future research included giving fuller consideration to the role of developmental trauma in identity formation. Clinical implications encourage understanding of looked after children and care leavers in the context of developmental trauma, rather than focusing on symptoms of various diagnoses.
Highlights
Identity FormationThere is no consensus in the definition of identity (Bosma, Grassfsma, Grotevant, & de Lavita, 1994)
The journey for each participant was unique, three superordinate themes emerged from the data which reflected the process and outcome of identity development
The impact of developmental trauma is documented within the literature with known effects on neurodevelopment, self-regulation, information processing, and relationships (Streeck-Fischer & van der Kolk, 2000)
Summary
There is no consensus in the definition of identity (Bosma, Grassfsma, Grotevant, & de Lavita, 1994). Importance is placed on the sameness and continuity of identity overtime (Bosma et al, 1994). The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families (Department of Health, 2000) defines identity as the child’s growing sense of self as a separate and valued person. It includes the child’s view of self and abilities, self-image and self-esteem, and having a positive sense of individuality. Feelings of belonging and acceptance by family, peer group and wider society, including other culture groups. Feelings of belonging and acceptance by family, peer group and wider society, including other culture groups. (p. 19)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.