Abstract

A contraction technique of the first author is used to derive, for a certain class of continua with contractible hyperspaces, results about Whitney stability, the cone = hyperspace property, and Whitney properties. Let C(X) be the hyperspace of subcontinua of the continuum X, and let ,u be a Whitney map on C(X). Kelley [61 has shown that if C(X) is contractible, then the contraction can be chosen so that each subcontinuum of X grows until it becomes X. The first author [3, 4] has improved this result by showing that the contraction may be chosen with the additional property that, at time t, the contraction has moved each point A of C(X) with ,u(A) t. In this paper, we exploit this contraction in several ways. We prove that if the continuum X has property K, has the covering property, and has arc components that are one-to-one continuous images of the real line such that both ends are dense in X, then the cone over X, Cone(X), is homeomorphic to C(X). Moreover, if pL is a Whitney map on C(X), then the homeomorphism may be chosen so that its restriction to X x { t} is a homeomorphism onto tcl(t). In particular, the base of the cone is mapped homeomorphically onto the singletons and the vertex onto the point X. Hence, such continua have the cone = hyperspace property and are Whitney stable. We give an example of a continuum with these properties that is neither arc-like nor circle-like. This gives a negative answer to Question 8.14 of [9]. The solenoids are examples of circle-like continua with these properties. We turn our attention to the more general class of continua with property K and with the property that each proper, nondegenerate subcontinuum is an arc. We construct a monotone map of Cone(X) onto C(X) similar to the homeomorphism above. In the case that X is the inverse limit of arcs with open maps as the bonding maps, we approximate this monotone map with a level-preserving homeomorphism. It follows that such a continuum has the cone = hyperspace property and is Whitney stable. This gives an affirmative answer to Question 14.22 of [9] and partial answers to Questions 8.11 and 8.15 of [9]. Modifications of these methods are used to show that the sin 1/x-curve and a ray spiralling on a circle do not admit essentially different Whitney maps. Received by the editors December 12, 1980 and, in revised form, February 23, 1981. 1980 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 54B20.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.