Which will carry more weight when CTR > 0.5, solid component size, CTR, tumor size or SUVmax?

Abstract

BackgroundThis study was conducted to explore the clinical significance of the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) in the clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with tumor size ≤ 2 cm and consolidation to tumor ratio (CTR) > 0.5. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent surgeries between January 2014 and March 2017. Clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor of size ≤ 2 cm and CTR > 0.5 were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: part-solid and pure-solid based on whether CTR = 1.0 or not. Nodules with any amount of solid or micropapillary components were regarded as the high-risk subtype. Time-dependent ROC curve was used to determine the best cut-off value. Finally, we analyzed the relationship between SUVmax, high-risk subtypes, node metastasis and 5-year relapse-free survival and overall survival. ResultsTotally, 270 patients were included. The distribution of pathological subtypes (p < 0.001), SUVmax (p < 0.001), and pathological N stage (p < 0.001) were different between the two groups. Multivariable analysis indicated that SUVmax could predict high-risk subtypes in cases of part-solid nodules (p < 0.001) and both high-risk subtypes (p = 0.022) and node metastasis (p < 0.001) in cases of pure-solid ones. SUVmax ≥ 2.6 and SUVmax ≥ 5.1 were strongly associated with 5-year relapse-free survival (p < 0.001) and 5-year overall survival (p < 0.001) among all the patients, respectively. ConclusionPart-solid nodules with 0.5 < CTR < 1 and pure-solid nodules in lung adenocarcinoma show different clinicopathological characteristics, especially in SUVmax. SUVmax is significantly associated with high-risk subtypes, node metastasis, 5-year relapse-free survival and overall survival.