Which vitamin D derivative to prescribe for renal patients

Abstract

It is possible to control the secondary hyperparathyroidism and osteitis fibrosa of patients with chronic kidney disease by calcitriol when given early and in appropriate doses. However, this control is often achieved at the price of unacceptably high plasma calcium and phosphorus levels, the induction of adynamic bone disease, and soft tissue calcification. To avoid these side effects, so-called 'nonhypercalcemic' vitamin D analogs have been developed. Their possible advantages and their precise place in the treatment and prevention of secondary hyperparathyroidism remain a matter of debate. A large US multicenter study showed that the administration of the vitamin D analog paricalcitol to hemodialysis patients, as compared with calcitriol, was associated with better survival. In a subsequent large US multicenter study paricalcitol-treated hemodialysis patients experienced fewer hospitalizations and hospital days compared with calcitriol-treated patients. In a third, smaller study from Japan, regular alfacalcidol users among hemodialysis patients had better cardiovascular survival than nonusers. Finally, in a recent historical control study the mortality of a large hemodialysis patient cohort was analyzed as a function of previous vitamin D treatment. Patients on active vitamin D compounds at any time had a 2-year survival advantage over vitamin D-naive patients. It must be pointed out, however, that all four studies were retrospective in nature. The development of vitamin D analogs with less side effects than with calcitriol is of major theoretical interest. Practically speaking, however, we still need to be convinced that this goal can be achieved in chronic kidney disease patients.