Which Type of Empiric Antibiotic Therapy is Appropriate? A 20-Year Retrospective Study of Bloodstream Infections in Childhood Cancer.

Abstract

IntroductionSufficient empirical antimicrobial therapy in febrile patients with cancer is challenging, owing to the limited arsenal of available antibiotics in an era of growing resistance. Because of the emergence of gram-negative bacteria resistant to ceftazidime and piperacillin, a combination antibiotic therapy was employed that uses meropenem combined with gentamicin and/or vancomycin if the patient further deteriorates.MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis was performed including all patients with catheter-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs) and treated for childhood cancer in a tertiary single centre between 1 January 2000 and 31 June 2018. We calculated the prevalence and the risk for BSIs and compared the in vitro susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents. ResultsOf 653 patients with childhood cancer, 113 patients (17.3%) were identified with a total of 139 BSIs, most of them occurring in patients with leukaemia (n = 90, 64.7%) and were associated with gram-positive bacteria (60.5%). In our cohort, all BSIs with gram-negative bacteria exhibited in vitro susceptibility against meropenem alone without any signs of resistance development. The antibiotic coverage of our meropenem-based combination therapy was also highly effective for gram-positive and non-fermenting bacteria. Thus, BSI-related mortality in all 139 BSI episodes was 1.4%. Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs), as main adverse event of carbapenem usage, occurred in only 16 (2.5%) patients.ConclusionOur meropenem-based combination therapy showed sufficient empirical antibiotic coverage in the majority of BSIs (96.4%) and did not result in an increased rate of unwanted side effects or development of antibiotic resistance.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00427-5.