Which surgical approach provides maximum visualization and access for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of femoral neck fractures?

Abstract

ObjectivesAppropriate visualization of the femoral neck is critical when performing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a femoral neck fracture. The purpose of this study was to objectively identify which surgical approach provided the most extensive visualization of the femoral neck during ORIF. Our hypothesis was that the Smith-Petersen approach with rectus release would provide the most extensive visualization. MethodsTen cadaveric hips were utilized to compare 4 different surgical approaches to the femoral neck: Smith-Petersen (SP), Smith-Petersen with rectus release (SPwR), Watson-Jones (WJ), and Hueter approach. After surgical exposure, calibrated digital images were captured and analyzed using a computer software program to determine the percent-area visualized. Three trained investigators separately assessed each specimen to determine clinical visualization and ability of the surgeon to manually outline anatomic locations of the femoral neck: subcapital, trans-cervical, and basicervical. Data were analyzed for significant (p < 0.05) differences using ANOVA and Fisher Exact tests. ResultsFor calculated percent-visualization, SP and SPwR allowed for significantly more (p = 0.003) visualization than the Hueter and WJ approaches. For surgeon visualization, SP and SPwR were significantly higher (p < 0.029) when compared to WJ. The ability for the individual surgeon to outline the femoral neck's anatomical landmarks was significantly higher (p < 0.049) with SP and Hueter approaches compared with SPwR. ConclusionThe SP and SPwR provided superior visualization of femoral neck anatomy compared to Hueter and WJ approaches. Similarly, the SP approach allowed for optimal surgeon visualization of and access to clinically relevant femoral neck anatomic landmarks compared to other approaches assessed.