Abstract
We examine the components of stock prices that play a key role in the pricing of the Amihud (2002) illiquidity measure. We first decompose the stock price series into permanent and transitory components and then construct the half-Amihud illiquidity measures on the days of positive and negative permanent price returns. We find that the transitory half-Amihud measure on the days of negative permanent price returns plays an important role in pricing the Amihud illiquidity even after controlling for the turnover ratio. This finding contrasts with that of Lou and Shu (2017) in that both the trading volume component and transitory price impact, drive the Amihud illiquidity premium.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The North American Journal of Economics and Finance
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
