Abstract
BackgroundThe average time for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) diagnosis is about 7.5 years. Many patients receive inadequate treatment and sometimes even life-threatening treatments such as tracheal intubation during this time. PurposeTo determine the risk factors for misdiagnosis of PNES as Epilepsy. MethodsThe medical records of patients who underwent video-electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring were reviewed retrospectively. Patients who had PNES without epileptic seizures (ES) were included in this study. Baseline personal and monitoring characteristics were collected. The patients were then divided into two groups based on their therapeutic status. Patients in the treatment group were again divided into two groups based on the number of anti-seizure medications (ASM) they were treated with. ResultsFifty-seven patients diagnosed with PNES were included in this study. Thirty-seven patients were under treatment, and 20 patients were not under treatment at the time of monitoring. Motor seizures, abnormal interictal EEG patterns, and pathological brain imaging findings were more frequent among patients in the treatment group (p<0.05). Patients with motor seizures were more likely to be treated with multiple ASM than patients with only dialeptic nonmotor seizures (p<0.05). Lastly, patients in the treatment group were monitored longer and had fewer seizures during monitoring (p<0.05). ConclusionPNES patients with abnormal EEG patterns and pathological brain imaging findings are more likely to be treated with ASM. The pure dialeptic nature of seizures is less likely to be misdiagnosed as ES. In addition, patients with such seizures are less likely to be treated with multiple treatment lines.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.