Abstract
This article explores the reasons why some banks issue Contingent Convertible (CoCo) bonds, but others do not. To this end, we use a binary logistic model and control for the determinants suggested by the literature. Our findings suggest that larger banks and those with higher Tier 1 capital, higher net loans, higher wholesale funding, lower levels of leverage, and lower risk-weighted assets have a higher tendency to issue CoCos and were the early adopters of this novel financing instrument. Our results also suggest that banks in countries with higher annual growth rate of GDP per capita and those listed as Globally Systematically Important Banks (G-SIBs) were more likely to issue CoCos. These results are difficult to explain by traditional capital structure theory, which assumes that companies voluntarily choose their optimal capital structures, but suggest that banks were more likely to be encouraged or nudged to issue CoCos by following regulators’ advice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.