Which emotion-regulation strategies explain the relationship between dispositional mindfulness, self-compassion, and eating to cope?

Abstract

Eating in response or to cope with negative emotions has been shown to be problematic in undergraduate students. Dispositional mindfulness and self-compassion have been associated with less eating in response or to cope with negative emotions; however, specific mechanisms underlying these relationships have never been tested. The aim of the present study is to test whether lower levels of specific difficulties in emotion-regulation (i.e., non-acceptance of emotional responses, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviour, impulse control difficulties, lack of emotional awareness, limited access to emotion-regulation strategies, lack of emotional clarity) explain the negative relationship between dispositional mindfulness and self-compassion with eating to cope. Undergraduate students (N = 307) aged 18 to 24 (M = 20.28) completed online self-report measures. Dispositional mindfulness and self-compassion were associated with lower levels of non-acceptance of emotional responses, which in turn was associated with less eating to cope. Dispositional mindfulness and self-compassion were also associated with lower levels of difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviour; however, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviour was unexpectedly associated with less eating to cope. To note, dispositional mindfulness was not associated with eating to cope when holding self-compassion constant. Results suggest that specific difficulties in emotion-regulation may explain the negative relationship between dispositional mindfulness and self-compassion with eating to cope. Findings contribute to theoretical models, and with replication can be used to inform the development of randomized-control trials examining the efficacy of mindfulness and self-compassion-based training for eating to cope in undergraduate students.