Which clinician responses to emotion are associated with more positive patient experiences of communication?

Abstract

ObjectivesTo identify communication strategies that may improve clinician-patient interactions, we assessed the association between clinician response to emotion and patient ratings of communication. MethodsFrom a cohort of 1817 clinician-patient encounters, we designed a retrospective case-control study by identifying 69 patients who rated their interpersonal care as low-quality and 69 patients who rated their care as high-quality. We used the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES) to identify patient emotional expressions and clinician responses. Using mixed-effects logistic regression, we evaluated the association between clinician responses to patients’ emotions and patient ratings of their interpersonal care. ResultsIn adjusted analyses, explicit responses that reduced space for further emotional communication were associated with high ratings of care (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.25, 2.99); non-explicit responses providing additional space were associated with low ratings (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36–0.82). In terms of specific response types, neutral/passive responses were associated with low ratings (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39–0.90), whereas giving information/advice was associated with high ratings (OR, 95% 1.91 CI 1.17–3.1). ConclusionsPatients may prefer responses to their expressed emotions that demonstrate clinician engagement, with or without expressions of empathy. Practice ImplicationsThese findings may inform educational interventions to improve clinician-patient communication.