Which are the Best Biological Markers of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome?

Abstract

The diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) requires the presence of both clinical and biological features. Due to the heterogeneity of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) the laboratory approach for their detection includes clotting-based tests for lupus anticoagulant (LA) as well as solidphase assays for anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL). In addition, as it has been shown that autoimmune aPL recognize epitopes on phospholipid (PL)-binding plasma proteins, assays detecting antibodies to β2-glycoprotein I (β2-GPI) or prothrombin have been developed. The association between venous or arterial thrombosis and recurrent fetal loss with the presence of conventional aPL (LA and/or aCL) has been confirmed by many studies. The LA and IgG aCL at moderate/high titre seem to exhibit the strongest association with clinical manifestations of the APS. Several reports indicate that LA is less sensitive but more specific than aCL for the APS. Assays against PLs other than CL as well as the use of mixtures of PLs have been proposed to improve the detection of APS-related aPL. Concerning antibodies to PL-binding proteins (detected in the absence of PLs), there is evidence that anti-β2-GPI are closely associated with thrombosis and other clinical features of the APS. Moreover, these antibodies may be more specific in the recognition of the APS and in some cases may be present in the absence of aPL detected by standard tests. Many issues are still under debate and are discussed in this review, such as the problems of standardization of anti-β2-GPI assays, detection of the IgA isotype of aCL and anti-β2-GPI, the coagulation profiles of LA in the recognition of the thrombotic risk and the association of particular markers with subsets of patients with APS.