Abstract

BackgroundData on the modalities of disclosing genomic secondary findings (SFs) remain scarce. We explore cancer patients’ and the general public’s perspectives about disclosing genomic SFs and the modalities of such disclosure.MethodsSixty-one cancer patients (n = 29) and members of the public (n = 32) participated in eight focus groups in Montreal and Quebec City, Canada. They were asked to provide their perspectives of five fictitious vignettes related to medically actionable and non-actionable SFs. Two researchers used a codification framework to conduct a thematic content analysis of the group discussion transcripts.ResultsCancer patients and members of the public were open to receive genomic SFs, considering their potential clinical and personal utility. They believed that the right to know or not and share or not such findings should remain the patient’s decision. They thought that the disclosure of SFs should be made mainly in person by the prescribing clinician. Maintaining confidentiality when so requested and preventing genetic discrimination were considered essential.ConclusionParticipants in this study welcomed the prospect of disclosing genomic SFs, as long as the right to choose to know or not to know is preserved. They called for the development of policies and practice guidelines that aim to protect genetic information confidentiality as well as the autonomy, physical and psychosocial wellbeing of patients and families.

Highlights

  • Data on the modalities of disclosing genomic secondary findings (SFs) remain scarce

  • The objective of the present study was to explore the perspectives of cancer patients and healthy members of the public about disclosing genomic SFs and, the modalities of such disclosure

  • The choice to include cancer patients is justified by the fact that oncology is a fertile ground for the development and applications of genetics and genomics, since the development of cancers is often linked to genomic changes [20]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Data on the modalities of disclosing genomic secondary findings (SFs) remain scarce. We explore cancer patients’ and the general public’s perspectives about disclosing genomic SFs and the modalities of such disclosure. New sequencing technologies offer several advantages and may be used for several purposes, in personalizing oncology treatments [1,2,3,4]. Secondary findings (SFs) from exome/genome sequencing may predict drug response or toxicity and reveal a predisposition to serious medical conditions in tested individuals [6, 7]. In some cases, such findings may help in disease prevention and treatment adjustment [8]. Being aware of genetic susceptibility to a serious illness, for which there is no treatment, can psychologically affect patients and their families at least in the short term [9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.