Abstract

Under China’s Rural Revitalization program, it is essential to accurately determine the prospects of revival or decay for the villages alongside specific goals and paths, which existing literature lacks a systematic coverage. Based on rural typology theories, this paper proposes an analytical framework to determine the type of village revitalization from the perspective of factor endowments. Utilizing five groups of 45 indicators characterizing the natural, socio-economic, and cultural endowments of villages, this paper applies the Self-Organizing Mapping neural network to cluster 2,388,579 natural villages in 48,322 townships across the nation into the four basic types of rural revitalization as directed by China’s Strategic Plan for Rural Revitalization (2018–2022): (1) Agglomerative Promotion, (2) Suburban Annexation, (3) Special Endowment-based Development, and (4) Out-migration and Relocation. The results of cluster analysis are spatially visualized to form a national rural revitalization zoning map at the township level, the first attempt to our knowledge. We conclude the paper with discussions on the revitalization paths of the various types of villages, particularly the seemingly gloomy prospect of 2/3 of the villages falling into the fourth category, and ways to interpret the deterministic nature of the conclusion. The paper expands the understanding of rural typology to a national scale with both innovative categorization processes and strong linkages to revitalization practices.

Highlights

  • Global urbanization since the industrial revolution has changed the way human lives [1,2]

  • We propose roadmaps for rural revitalization according to the endowment conditions of each type of village, especially the “Special Endowment-based Development” type of village

  • Based on the literature on rural typology and considering the characteristics of rural China, we develop a village classification indicator system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global urbanization since the industrial revolution has changed the way human lives [1,2]. The other side of urban development is the decay of the countryside. The trend of rural decay is an inevitable by-product of urbanization. This means that even at the terminal stage of urbanization, the countryside will still exist [4]. The decay of the countryside is a long-term process. From a humanitarian point of view, it is inappropriate to be unconcerned about the fate of the people who must live in the decaying villages. Unlike developed countries, where the urban-rural divide can be seen as a difference in lifestyle [8], that in developing countries is more of the disparity in living standards. The decay of the countryside, would worsen the conditions in the already poor villages. Rural decay brings a labor shortage, making it impossible to meet the necessary threshold for an agglomeration economy [10,11]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call