Abstract
With Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) discussion of cohesion in text, linguists have long established the relation between cohesive devices employed, discursive context and register (González 2013; Guijarro 2016). However, cohesion studies in the realm of comics have largely revolved around the visual alone so far (Groensteen 2007; Kress & van Leeuwen 1996). Further, the question of how cohesive devices are employed in comics so as to attain specific discursive functions both as a reflection of the genre and as a multimodal medium remains unexplored. Based upon Halliday & Hasan’s treatment of cohesion, the present research therefore addresses these deficits by examining cohesion in 20 Marvel and 21 DC modern-era comics, comprising a corpus totaling 70,865 words (tokens) and 9,805 lexemes (word types). Where cohesion was maintained, personal deixis (38.59%), endophora (12.80%), lexical repetition (11.11%) and discourse deixis (10.32%) were the most frequent (fi ≥ 10%) cohesive ties. In incohesive sentences, the cohesion breaks could be attributed to changes in narrative stage (16.85%), ellipsis (12.68%), exophora (12.08%) and so-called delayed cohesion (11.53%), whereby cohesion amongst a series of sentences is interrupted by topic digressions or prefaces beyond the discursive context but immediately re-established thereafter. These findings illuminate the multimodal interdependency between text and image in superhero comics and its effect on realizing and resolving (non–)cohesive language.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.