Abstract

This paper presents a review of research on shear strength of reinforced concrete members without stirrups (shear reinforcement). A database of 1849 available experimental results from over the past 60 years is examined and these results are compared to predictions from current North American shear design procedures. Special attention is paid to the behavior of beams ranging from short span deep beams to members controlled by flexure. The findings from the review indicate that using the current ACI shear provisions to decide where shear reinforcement is required can be unconservative for members with larger effective depths, or higher stresses in the longitudinal reinforcement. Improvements to the ACI Code are proposed to mitigate these weaknesses. The AASHTO-LRFD and Canadian CSA sectional and strut-and-tie provisions are found to provide a more uniform level of safety for all member types. The results from this review can allow engineers to identify members in their own structure where a more conservative shear design procedure is appropriate.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.