Abstract
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is rising rapidly in Asian populations due to lifestyle changes and increased life expectancy. With the rapidly increasing number of patients with diabetes worldwide, diabetic nephropathy (DN) is becoming one of the most common causes of renal disease. Indeed, approximately 20–40% of diabetic patients develop DN [1]. The diagnosis of DN is based primarily on clinical features such as lengthy duration of diabetes and presence of target organ damage, especially proteinuria usually preceding decreased renal function. Although validation of this clinical approach is well established in type 1 diabetes, it is much more difficult in patients with type 2 diabetes because of the unknown duration of the disease [2]. The characteristic pathological features of DN are diffuse or nodular mesangial sclerosis, glomerular basement membrane thickening accompanied by chronic interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy usually observed in advanced glomerulosclerosis, and hyaline changes in both afferent and efferent arterioles. However, nondiabetic renal disease (NDRD) occurs in patients with type 2 diabetes, and can be either isolated or superimposed on underlying diabetic glomerulosclerosis. Interestingly, NDRD is associated with a broad spectrum of symptoms [3], [4], [5]. The ability to clearly differentiate between renal lesions associated with DN and NDRD in diabetic patients is critical for making appropriate treatment decisions, and thus numerous research efforts are focused on how to identify DN in patients with diabetes. Recently, Liang et al [5] performed a meta-analysis of 26 relevant studies comprising 2,322 patients and suggested that the absence of diabetic retinopathy (DR), shorter duration of diabetes, lower HbA1C, and lower BP may help to distinguish NDRD from DN in patients with diabetes [5]. In this issue of Kidney Research and Clinical Practice, Kim et al [6] retrospectively analyzed renal pathological findings including the incidence of NDRD in 75 diabetic patients who underwent renal biopsy for clinically suspected NDRD. They also analyzed the clinical characteristics and renal prognosis of patients with DN and NDRD. They found that 10 patients (13.3%) had only DN, 11 patients (14.7%) had DN with superimposed NDRD, and 54 patients (72%) had only NDRD. The most common pathological findings of NDRD were membranous nephropathy (23.1%), IgA nephropathy (21.5%), and acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (15.4%). Compared with DN and NDRD superimposed on DN, the clinical characteristics of NDRD consisted of a short duration of diabetes and less severe DR. Conversely, patients with combined DN and NDRD exhibited the lowest baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the greatest proportion of renal deterioration during follow-up. Based on these findings, Kim et al [6] concluded that renal biopsy should be recommended for type 2 diabetic patients with atypical nephropathy, because a considerable number of these patients may have NDRD. However, there were several limitations in their study. First, pathological determination of DN and NDRD was based only on histological findings by light microscopy rather than by electron microscopy. Because the early stages of DN may not be observed with light microscopy, electron microscopy findings may provide a clearer differentiation of renal lesions. Second, the follow-up duration for patients with NDRD was much shorter compared to that in patients with DN, and thus determination of renal prognosis was not appropriate between groups with different follow-up periods.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.