Abstract
Minimizing systematic and random errors within the testing process enables the reporting of quality results. Laboratories have developed multiple strategies to control the variables within the analytical testing phase, but often have little authority over the variables imposed during the pre- and postanalytical phases. Unlike the postanalytical processes, which mainly rely on correct result transmission and subsequent interpretation, preanalytical processes can directly influence the analytical value reported by the laboratory (1). This is a conundrum that requires laboratory employees to define acceptability criteria for parameters such as proper mixing of samples with any required collection tube additives such as heparin or EDTA, the number of hours the sample can remain unprocessed (for serum/plasma tests), transport temperature, and the number of days following collection that additional testing can be added on, which is often storage temperature-dependent. All these parameters (and more!) can be generally classified under “stability.” During the assay development process, …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.