Abstract
Key points The peer review system is viewed by many as being flawed and antiquated. While it is unlikely that the system will be overhauled completely, some changes seem to be warranted. Our proposal is to change the incentives to do peer review by making reviews a part of the tenure criteria and valuing reviews as a contribution to the literature. The proposal would require more transparency than is currently the industry norm to prevent unwanted effects. We believe these changes would not only increase willingness to review, but also lead to shorter turnaround times and increase the quality of reviews.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
