Abstract

The latest controversies in our field highlight the chasm between the pursuit of rigorous, replicable, science and disciplinary incentives that reward the publication of novel findings, the use of questionable research strategies, and a preference for ideologically uniform narratives. To advance our discipline, I argue we should embrace the open science movement and leverage the empirical work that highlights the limits of social science generally, and criminology specifically. Embracing the open science movement, however, is more than changing the mechanics of our science. It will also require a cultural change -- one that prioritizes the pursuit of truth over all else.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.