When to Consider Invasive Lymph Node Staging in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer? A Novel Scoring System Utilising Metabolic Parameters in 18F-FDG PET/CT

Abstract

ObjectiveThe maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) is a widely utilised metric in positron emission tomography/computed tomography for clinically staging non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet the reliability of SUVmax remains controversial. We herein aimed to assess the effectiveness of semi-quantitative parameters, encompassing size, SUVmax, metabolic tumour volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and heterogeneity factor (HF), in evaluating both primary tumours and lymph nodes (LNs) on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. A novel scoring system was devised to appraise the role of semi-quantitative parameters and visually evaluate LNs for nodal staging. Materials and MethodsPatients with pathological NSCLC, diagnosed between 2014 and 2019 and clinically staged I-III, were enrolled in the study. Patient demographics, including age, sex, tumour location, diameter, tumour-node-metastasis stage, as well as SUVmax, MTV, TLG and HF parameters of primary tumours and LNs, were documented. ResultsThe analysis comprised 319 patients and 963 LNs. Patients had a mean age of 61.62 years, with 91.5% being male. Adenocarcinoma exhibited a histological association with LN metastasis (P=0.043). The study findings revealed that tumour size, SUVmax, MTV, TLG and HF did not significantly affect the detection of LN metastasis. Conversely, non-squamous cell carcinoma, LNs exhibiting higher FDG levels than the liver, LN size, SUVmax, MTV and TLG were identified as risk factors (P<0.0001). The identified cut-off values were 1.05cm for LN size, 4.055 for SUVmax, 1.805cm3 for MTV and 5.485 for TLG. The scoring system incorporated these parameters, and visual assessment indicated that a score of ≥3 increased the risk of metastasis by 14.33 times. ConclusionWe devised a novel scoring system and demonstrated that LNs with a score of ≥3 in patients with NSCLC have a high likelihood of metastasis. This innovative scoring system can serve as a valuable tool to mitigate excessive and extreme measures in the assessment of invasive pathological staging.