Abstract

Many techniques are used today to study insect morphology, including light and electron microscopy. Most of them require to specifically prepare the sample, precluding its use for further investigation. In contrast, micro-CT allows a sample to be studied in a non-destructive and rapid process, even without specific treatments that might hinder the use of rare and hard-to-find species in nature. We used synchrotron radiation (SR) micro-CT and conventional micro-CT to prepare 3D reconstructions of Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hymenoptera species that had been processed with 4 common preparation procedures: critical-point drying, sputter-coating, resin embedding, and air-drying. Our results showed that it is possible to further utilize insect samples prepared with the aforementioned preparation techniques for the creation of 3D models. Specimens dried at the critical point showed the best results, allowing us to faithfully reconstruct both their external surface and their internal structures, while sputter-coated insects were the most troublesome for the 3D reconstruction procedure. Air-dried specimens were suitable for external morphological analyses, while anatomical investigation of soft internal organs was not possible due to their shrinking and collapsing. The sample included in resin allowed us to reconstruct and appreciate the external cuticle and the internal parts. In this work, we demonstrate that insect samples destined to different analyses can be used for new micro-CT studies, further deepening the possibility of state-of-the-art morphological analyses.

Highlights

  • Scientific research on insects is usually supported by a variety of techniques, which allow the gaining of knowledge on their morphology and anatomy [1]

  • Samples that had been glued on cardboard (e.g., Paussus favieri) in some cases had great amounts of glue, especially at the level of the mouthparts and the lower part of the the hole caused by the pin itself

  • The abdomen was almost always collapsed, and this determined that even a large part of the internal organs was no longer preserved, not allowing a correct visualization inonce

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scientific research on insects is usually supported by a variety of techniques, which allow the gaining of knowledge on their morphology and anatomy [1]. Scanning electron microscopy (SBSFM) [9], dual-beam scanning electron microscopy (FIBSEM) [10,11,12,13], nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMRI) [14,15], and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) [16,17,18] All these techniques have advantages and disadvantages and require specimen preparation before they can be performed. It is not always possible to have many samples of a certain species and if destructive analyses were to be performed, for example by embedding, sputter-coating, or preparing them for histology, this would make it impossible to use the same samples for further studies using different techniques. Some specimens may come from old museum collections and be holotypes of a certain species, prohibiting the use of analyses schemes that would damage the specimens

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call