Abstract

In the church tradition, we find that the great theologians were also deeply involved in the life of the church as bishops, priests, or pastors who served the believers in their parishes, though, even at that time, practicing theology started to drift apart from performing pastoral work. In Modernity, however, things began to change radically, especially with the development of theology as an academic discipline and even more so with the development of the profession of the theologian specializing in religious studies. This phenomenon penetrated Protestant churches in particular, but it is also found in Orthodoxy. In this study, we advance the hypothesis that, despite its negative connotation, the gap between academic theology and church life opens up the possibility of a promising dialogue between Evangelicals and the Orthodox in Romania. Especially in the last 30 years, theologians from both communities have interacted in the context of doctoral research, scientific conferences, and research projects, although the dialogue between church leaders and hierarchs is almost non-existent. We analyze whether this incipient theological dialogue could possibly create a bridge between the two communities and within them and between academia and the church. We believe that one of the best ways to reduce the distance between them is to build on the interest of the current generation of theologians from both churches in Biblical studies, in Patristic theology, and in the work of the Romanian theologian Dumitru Stăniloae.

Highlights

  • Today, all church traditions face, to a greater or lesser extent, a certain fracture between academic theology and the life of the church

  • The section of this paper briefly presents the evolution of the relationship between academic theology and church life during three historical periods: Patristic, Late Medieval, and Modernity

  • After 1990, further tensions between academia and the ecclesia were nurtured by the excessive increase of the number of Orthodox faculties of theology (14 at present) and the number of their graduates far exceeding the need for new parish priests, in addition to the significant reductions of quality teaching in these institutions due to the lack of sufficiently well-trained teachers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

All church traditions face, to a greater or lesser extent, a certain fracture between academic theology and the life of the church. Discussion about this phenomenon occurring (Womack and Pillay 2019) only after the Reformation is restrictive and does not consider several important dynamics regarding its evolution in the earlier Christian tradition, such as the relationship between faith and reason, on the one hand, and that between the charisma and the ecclesial institution, on the other. The potential of a rupture between theological reflection and the life of the church is somehow intrinsically linked to both the nature of religious experience and its dynamics throughout history in the various social contexts in which the Christian faith has manifested In addressing this issue, we are using two distinctions whereby the dynamics of the Christian community can be more evaluated: reason vs faith and charisma vs institution. Starting from the above distinctions, we aim to emphasize several specific characteristics of three different historical periods and their legacy with respect to the present time

The Patristic Period
Late Medieval Period
Reformation and Modernity
The Gap between Academia and the Church within the Romanian Context
The Orthodox Church
Evangelicalism
Premises for an Incipient Orthodox–Evangelical Dialogue
Academic Initiatives
Ecumenical Meetings
Local Projects
Theological Resources
The Existing Experience of the Orthodox–Evangelical Academic Dialogue
Religious Teachers in the General Education System
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call